Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a global score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 global score. Even though the Moto Z2 Force Edition is incredibly older than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's body is way lighter and a lot thinner. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a greater camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.