Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting a 79.8 score against 76.1. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should count with identical OS features. The Motorola One Hyper body is just a bit thinner than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it's a bit heavier and was released about 17 months before.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G and the Motorola One Hyper both feature very similar screens, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater display density. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.