Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Blue and Brown |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 score. The Motorola One Vision construction is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it was released 2 years before. The Motorola One Vision features a CPU that is just as good as the TCL 20 Pro 5G one, and although the Motorola One Vision has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One Vision features a bit better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. The Motorola One Vision has a camera that's very similar to the TCL 20 Pro 5G one, and although the Motorola One Vision has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low light situations, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB more internal memory. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.