Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Cyber shade |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 76.1 score against 75.8. The TCL 20 Pro 5G is a newer phone, and it's also a bit thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but TCL 20 Pro 5G has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little sharper screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a just a bit lower display density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a same size display. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a very superior memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a bit better photos and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger aperture and a lot better video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little bit longer battery performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.