Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Ocean |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 is slightly better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 79.7 against 76.1. OPPO Find X2 is an older phone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but Oppo was able to make it somewhat thinner and a little lighter. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but OPPO Find X2 has an older 10 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 has a sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a greater pixel density.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2, and although they both have the same internal storage, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. OPPO Find X2 features just a bit better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and faster video frame rate.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.