Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Ocean |
| Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is slightly better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 global score. Despite of the fact OPPO Find X2 Pro is older and just a bit heavier than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's construction is still a bit thinner. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a higher pixels amount per display inch. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture, faster video frame rate and a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a little longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.