Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | -- |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter device than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, even though they were only released 1 months apart. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy A52 has a little more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. TCL 20 Pro 5G has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in TCL 20 Pro 5G. Galaxy A52 features a little bit better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.