Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, with an 88.1 score against 76.1. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy F62 is a somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the TCL 20 Pro 5G. Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the same number of pixels per display inch and a screen with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit better processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has lesser cpu cores , they both have a 6 GB RAM memory. Galaxy F62 captures clearer photos and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a way better 64 MP resolution camera and a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery duration than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.