Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is much better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 score. Galaxy M51 is better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, we must tell that it's also a somewhat heavier and a bit thicker device. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
Galaxy M51 has a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 and TCL 20 Pro 5G have quite similar displays, and although the Galaxy M51 has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a display with the same size.
The Galaxy M51 takes slightly better pictures and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M51 also has a bigger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery duration than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.