Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. Galaxy S10e is an incredibly older phone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but it is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little sharper screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.