Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a score of 98 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and somewhat heavier device than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, but Samsung managed to make it just a little thinner anyway. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little faster CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.