Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | -- |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | -- |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 90.7 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is notably thinner and extremely lighter than the TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, offering some extra features.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a bit bigger screen, more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a bit better battery duration than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited environments, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.