Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-20 | -- |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | -- |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has a score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. Galaxy S6 Active is a a little bit thinner and way lighter cellphone than the TCL 20 Pro 5G. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a bit better processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit. Galaxy S6 Active features a much sharper screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixel amount in each screen inch.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a bigger camera aperture and a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features longer battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.