Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 overall score. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, we must tell that it's also an older, thicker and notably heavier device.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a brighter display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 192 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a lot bigger sensor.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro count with extremely similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.