Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a score of 92.3 against 76.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the TCL 20 Pro 5G were released only 9 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is noticeably thinner and just a little bit lighter. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.