Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a 94.6 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is incredibly heavier but notably thinner than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, and they were only released with a few months difference. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with very similar operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better processing power than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a battery life that's very similar to the battery life in TCL 20 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.