Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is slightly better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a 77.2 score against 76.1. Although Xperia XZs is way older than TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Xperia XZs counts with a bit better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xperia XZs counts with a superior camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller back camera sensor offering a lower image quality, a tinier aperture, a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.