Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.03 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted Blue and Milky Way Gray | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is better than the TCL 20S's score of 69.2. The LG V35 ThinQ body is thinner and noticeably lighter than the TCL 20S, although it was released many years before. LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than TCL 20S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixels density.
TCL 20S counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than TCL 20S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The TCL 20S has a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. TCL 20S has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the TCL 20S also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than TCL 20S, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.