Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.734.6
Basic Information
VerizonNokia
2010-10-042007-05-31
4.30 x 2.10 x 0.80 inches3.79 x 1.83 x 0.64 inches
4.60 ounces4.33 ounces
$ 150.00$ 105.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.16.4
processor processor
192 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--20,48 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
1.320.3
Camera
3.20 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
5.065.61
EV-DO A and CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.20.4
Battery Life
1140mAh Li-Ion Battery900mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
490 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
320 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.82.4
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.0
GPS--
CompassLight Sensor

Comparison review

The Nokia 6500 slide has a general score of 34.6, which is just a bit better than Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine's 31.7 general score. Nokia 6500 slide is an a lot older cellphone than the Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine, but Nokia was able to make it a bit lighter and a lot thinner. The Nokia 6500 slide's processor is just as good as the processor in Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine, they have the same number of cores.

The Nokia 6500 slide features a little more vivid screen than Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine. They have a display of the same size, the same screen density and an equal 320 x 240 resolution. The Nokia 6500 slide shoots much better photos and videos than Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine. They have a camera in the back with a 3.2 mega pixels resolution.

The Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Nokia 6500 slide. Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne Ravine has improved battery duration than Nokia 6500 slide, because it has 1140mAh of battery capacity instead of 900mAh.

The Nokia 6500 slide not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.