Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.3 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Verizon | Motorola |
| -- | 2005-11-08 |
| 4.02 x 2.01 x 0.60 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 120.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | -- |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR V3c has a global score of 31.2, which is slightly better than the Verizon Wireless Salute's 29.3 general score. Motorola RAZR V3c is a lighter device than the Verizon Wireless Salute, but both of them are 0.6inches thick. The Motorola RAZR V3c and Verizon Wireless Salute both feature quite similar CPUs, they have a 0-Core processing unit.
Verizon Wireless Salute features a much sharper screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a better 320 x 240 resolution. The Motorola RAZR V3c features a camera that's just as good as the Verizon Wireless Salute one, both of them have the same resolution camera. The Motorola RAZR V3c has a superior storage for games and applications than Verizon Wireless Salute.
Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a way better battery life than Verizon Wireless Salute.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola RAZR V3c is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.