Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.3 | 31 |
| Basic Information | |
| Verizon | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| 4.02 x 2.01 x 0.60 inches | 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 2.32 ounces |
| $ 120.00 | $ 85.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | -- |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 320 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2630 is slightly better than Verizon Wireless Salute, with a 31 score against 29.3. The Nokia 2630 is a a lot lighter and thinner device than the Verizon Wireless Salute. The Verizon Wireless Salute features a much better screen than Nokia 2630, because it has a lot better resolution of 320 x 240 and a lot higher pixels density.
Nokia 2630 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Verizon Wireless Salute. Verizon Wireless Salute and Nokia 2630 count with extremely similar CPUs, both of them have 0 cores. Verizon Wireless Salute counts with a greater camera than Nokia 2630, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Nokia 2630 features a very superior battery performance than Verizon Wireless Salute.
Nokia 2630 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.