Search


Compare phones

Vertu Ascent Ti
Global Score
32.341.4
Basic Information
VertuAcer
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.1
--2009-02-16
4.55 x 1.93 x 0.52 inches4.19 x 2.32 x 0.54 inches
7.76 ounces4.64 ounces
$ 1400.00$ 1360.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)480 x 640 pixels (VGA)
TFTTFT
154 pixels per inch286 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.27
processorSamsung SC3 6400 (Single-Core 533 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
Storage
4 GB internal memory--
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
2.50
Camera
3.00 MP3.20 MP
5.065.06
Networks
--Wi-Fi
UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.43.5
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery1530mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
150 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.483.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.0
--GPS
--Light Sensor

Comparison review

Acer X960 has an overall score of 41.4, which is much better than Vertu Ascent Ti's global score of 32.3. The Acer X960 is a just a bit thicker but a lot lighter device than the Vertu Ascent Ti. Acer X960 has a brighter screen than Vertu Ascent Ti, because it has a lot higher display density and a much better resolution of 640 x 480 pixels.

The Acer X960 has a better performing processing unit than Vertu Ascent Ti, because it has 1 more CPU cores. Acer X960 counts with a camera that is just as good as the camera in Vertu Ascent Ti, although the Acer X960 also has a better 3.2 mega pixels resolution camera. Vertu Ascent Ti counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Acer X960, although it has no external memory card slot.

Acer X960 has a much longer battery performance than Vertu Ascent Ti, because it has a 61 percent larger battery size.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Acer X960 is also the cheapest one, making it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.