Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 21.3 | 23.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vertu | Nokia |
| -- | 2002-11-04 |
| 4.80 x 1.65 x 0.61 inches | 4.27 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 3.67 ounces |
| $ 10300.00 | $ 90.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFD | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 720mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 225 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.08 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 5100 has a general score of 23.2, which is just a bit better than Vertu Signature's score of 21.3. The Nokia 5100 design is way thicker but much lighter than the Vertu Signature. Nokia 5100 features a processor that's just as good as the processor in Vertu Signature, they have a 0-Core processor.
The Nokia 5100 has just a bit better display than Vertu Signature. The Nokia 5100 has as much memory for apps and games as the Vertu Signature one. The Vertu Signature features improved battery duration than Nokia 5100, because it has a 950mAh battery size instead of 720mAh. Nokia 5100's camera is just as good as Vertu Signature's camera.
Nokia 5100 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.