Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 21.3 | 23.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vertu | Nokia |
| -- | 2003-11-11 |
| 4.80 x 1.65 x 0.61 inches | 4.64 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 3.76 ounces |
| $ 10300.00 | $ 139.00 |
| -- | 96 x 65 pixels |
| TFD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 2.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.56 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6010 is slightly better than the Vertu Signature, having a general score of 23.3 against 21.3. The Nokia 6010 body is incredibly lighter but incredibly thicker than Vertu Signature. The Nokia 6010 features just a bit better screen than Vertu Signature. Nokia 6010 and Vertu Signature count with really similar memory capacity for apps and games.
The Nokia 6010 and Vertu Signature feature incredibly similar processing units, they have 0 cpu cores. Nokia 6010 features a bit longer battery performance than Vertu Signature, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia 6010 features a camera that's just as good as the camera in Vertu Signature.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Nokia 6010 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.