Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Videocon | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 3.03 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 187 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is way better than Videocon A52, with a global score of 80 against 44.8. Google Pixel 3 features a better looking display than Videocon A52, because it has a quite bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a lot greater pixels density. Google Pixel 3 has a lot better processing power than Videocon A52, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Videocon A52, because it has a way higher 12.2 MP resolution back camera. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Videocon A52, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior battery performance than Videocon A52, because it has a 2915mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Google Pixel 3 costs a little more than the Videocon A52, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.