Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Celestial Blue, Meteorite Gray and Moonlight White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A50, with a overall score of 85.2 against 83.8. The Xiaomi 11T Pro construction is way newer than Galaxy A50's, although it's heavier and thicker. Xiaomi 11T Pro features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit bigger display.
Xiaomi 11T Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi 11T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi 11T Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 25 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi 11T Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi 11T Pro features longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.