Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-15 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Celestial blue, Meteorite Gray and Moonlight White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a bit better than the Xiaomi 11T, getting an 88.1 score against 85.3. The Apple iPhone X body is thinner and lighter than Xiaomi 11T, although it was released 4 years before. The iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi 11T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit better pixel quantity per inch in the display.
The iPhone X has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi 11T, because it has more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone X has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi 11T, because although it has less and slower CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Xiaomi 11T takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi 11T also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera. Xiaomi 11T features a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.