Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-12-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Pink | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 524 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.78 inches (1/1.28") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi 12 Pro's 79.6 global score. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi 12 Pro has Android 12 version. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, extremely thicker and much heavier cellphone than Xiaomi 12 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really superior performance than Xiaomi 12 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi 12 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a really bigger display.
The Xiaomi 12 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot better resolution camera in the back and a much larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi 12 Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.