Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-12-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Pink | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 418 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi 12's score of 78.8. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi 12 has Android 12 version, so it provides some additional features and performance optimizations. Even being the best we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is older, noticeably thicker and a lot heavier than Xiaomi 12.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better processing power than Xiaomi 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Xiaomi 12 have really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display pixels density.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi 12, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in Xiaomi 12.
The Xiaomi 12 has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, it also counts with a way larger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs, a much higher video resolution and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.