Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| -- | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4800mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, with a general score of 81.9 against 81. Google Pixel 4 counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a larger screen, a just a little better pixels amount per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4800mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh. Xiaomi 12S Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.