Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 524 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4800mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Xiaomi 12S Ultra's construction is a lot lighter and notably thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a newer 12 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, counting with a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi 12S Ultra has better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4800mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.