Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-10-04 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 8100 MT6895Z (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.6 inches (1/1.67") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi 12T, with a 97.6 score against 75.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold is noticeably older and incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi 12T, it's body is still a lot thinner. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi 12T has Android 12 version, providing the user some extra features.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi 12T, because although it has a little bit lower screen density and a bit lower resolution of 1536 x 2152px, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi 12T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Fold features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi 12T, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi 12T has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi 12T counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.