Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue, Grey and Purple | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 12X has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. The Xiaomi 12X is a newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Xiaomi 12X has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi 12X has a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little better pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi 12X, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi 12X, because it has more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a camera that is just as good as Xiaomi 12X's camera, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a lower 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi 12X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.