Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-03-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue, Grey and Purple | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 418 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi 12X, with an 80.1 score against 77.8. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is older, much thicker and much heavier than Xiaomi 12X. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi 12X has Android 11 version, providing some additional features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi 12X, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Xiaomi 12X count with quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels quantity in each screen inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi 12X, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi 12X features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a battery performance that is very similar to the Xiaomi 12X one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.