Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-02-22 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a score of 84.4, which is better than Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra design is much newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's extremely heavier and a lot thicker. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Xiaomi 14 Ultra has 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger display. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less cores.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments, a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video definition. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.