Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-02-22 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.75 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 524 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi 14 Ultra's overall score of 84.4. The Galaxy F62 is an extremely older and a bit thicker phone than the Xiaomi 14 Ultra, but Samsung was able to build it just a little lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi 14 Ultra has Android 14.
Galaxy F62 features a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a lot better screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra also has a lot brighter display, a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a much lower image and video quality and a back camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a superior battery life than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.