Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-02-22 | -- |
| 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having a score of 84.4 against 80.9. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but Xiaomi 14 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a way better processing power than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way larger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low-light images, a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.