Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-02-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 524 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a overall score of 84.4 against 80.1. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra design is notably newer, lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi 14 Ultra has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a lot larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior CPU than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.