Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-02-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.75 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xiaomi 14 Ultra, with a 94.6 score against 84.4. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi 14 Ultra has Android 14. Despite of the fact Galaxy Z Fold 2 is incredibly older and incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi 14 Ultra, it's construction is still thinner.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi 14 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Xiaomi 14 Ultra's one, both have the same 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.