Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi 14T Pro's 84.5 score. Apple iPhone X's body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, even though it was released many years before. The Apple iPhone X counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a more vivid display than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a lot brighter screen. The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a way better camera than iPhone X, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a lot better video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro and the iPhone X both have incredibly similar storage to store more games and applications, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.