Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a general score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Even though the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a lot newer than the HTC U Ultra, it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower pixels amount in each display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, it also counts with a bigger display.
The HTC U Ultra has an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although faster) and 8 GB less RAM memory. The HTC U Ultra counts with a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi 14T Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture, a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with much more MP. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.