Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-09-26 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro's 84.5 global score. The Galaxy Fold construction is somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, but it's way heavier and was released 5 years before. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi 14T Pro has Android 14.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features a way better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi 14T Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with way more megapixels and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.