Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than Xiaomi 14T Pro's score of 84.5. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, even though it was released many years before. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi 14T Pro has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a little smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro. Both have 12 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rate, a smaller back camera sensor providing a worse image quality and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.