Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T Pro is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a score of 84.5 against 75.8. The Xiaomi 14T Pro construction is much newer and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is also somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a little worse pixel density, it also counts with much more brightness and a way bigger display.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S7 Active counts with an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has less RAM memory and lesser processing cores.
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.