Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with a global score of 84.5 against 81. The Xiaomi 14T Pro body is way newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi 14T Pro has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a lot better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a quite better 1220 x 2712px resolution and a little larger display.
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi 14T Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a lot bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.