Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro's 84.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is thinner than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, but it is extremely heavier and was released many years before. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi 14T Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much faster CPU than Xiaomi 14T Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way better video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi 14T Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both count with extremely similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both have equal 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.