Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with an 84.5 score against 76.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi 14T Pro has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version. The Xiaomi 14T Pro body is much newer and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's, but it's a bit heavier.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a quite higher screen density and a bit larger display. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery performance in Xiaomi 14T Pro, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a 5020mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Xiaomi 14T Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.