Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has an overall score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi 14T Pro has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, so it provides the user some additional features. The Xiaomi 14T Pro construction has the same weight than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's a little bit thinner.
Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi 14T Pro also has a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen and a bit higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Xiaomi 14T Pro, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Xiaomi 14T Pro captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a more megapixels back-facing camera, a way higher video resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.