Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-09-26 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 83.7 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi 14T is a a lot newer phone, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but Xiaomi 14T has older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior performance than Xiaomi 14T. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi 14T has a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi 14T also has a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution and a quite greater pixel quantity in each display inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with as much memory capacity for apps and games as the Xiaomi 14T, they have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S's battery duration is very similar to the Xiaomi 14T one. Xiaomi 14T counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi 14T also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much larger sensor and a more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.