Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T has a global score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi 14T has the newer 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features. The Xiaomi 14T body is notably newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S.
Xiaomi 14T counts with an incredibly better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi 14T also has a quite better pixel density, a little bit higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and much more brightness. The Xiaomi 14T has a much better storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi 14T, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi 14T features just a little better battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi 14T, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot more MP camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.